flux Ecologie

▸ les 10 dernières parutions

20.05.2026 à 10:41

Greenpeace exposes Amazon Cloud’s toxic partnerships and demands an end to Big Tech’s impunity 

Greenpeace International

Texte intégral (912 mots)

Hamburg, Germany – As Amazon holds its virtual Annual Meeting of Shareholders, Greenpeace Germany is exposing the systematic role of its cloud subsidiary Amazon Web Services (AWS), in supporting some of the world’s most controversial companies such as Shell and Palantir. A new Greenpeace Germany study, Amazon’s Toxic Web Services, reveals that the world’s largest cloud provider acts as a critical technological backbone for climate chaos, human rights violations, or attacks on democratic institutions.

On May 20, 2026, Greenpeace Germany activists protested the reckless business practices of Amazon’s cloud division at the Hamburg AWS Summit. The activists disrupted the event during a morning keynote by displaying a giant banner on stage bearing the message “Leave the Toxic Cloud”.

Mauricio Vargas, economic policy expert in Greenpeace Germany, said:
“Whether it is rainforest destruction, fossil fuel expansion or human rights violations, wherever there is money to be made, Amazon’s cloud division looks the other way. AWS profits from companies that even mainstream financial investors refuse to touch on ethical grounds. A cloud built on this kind of business is not neutral infrastructure, it is complicity at industrial scale.”

Greenpeace research reveals that the Amazon Cloud maintains business relationships with at least 38 percent of the companies flagged on global ethical and environmental exclusion lists. This includes Big Oil giant Shell, the Brazilian meat corporation JBS, the surveillance firm Palantir and the autonomous weapons systems specialist Anduril. Using exclusion criteria used by the Norwegian Sovereign Wealth Fund and organisations like Urgewald and PAX, researchers identified that AWS provides infrastructure to at least 100 high-risk entities.[2][3][4][5]

The authors point to a glaring contradiction: while other sectors like finance and pharmaceuticals are bound by strict regulations and voluntary commitments, the Amazon Cloud and the wider Big Tech industry operate largely in an ethical vacuum, despite their immense systemic influence on society.

Sanna Ghotbi, Global Tech Campaigner for Greenpeace International, said: “Amazon is a clear‑cut example of big tech’s overreach, concentrating unprecedented power, wealth and influence at the expense of people’s rights, climate, biodiversity and peace. As we have seen in Europe and now in China, Donald Trump is acting as a personal lobbyist for this sector, using tariffs and open threats to bully states’ digital sovereignty. It is time to put an end to Big Tech’s impunity and to make sure that tech is serving the public good.”

In response, Greenpeace Germany has proposed a new framework of environmental and ethical minimum standards for cloud providers demanding that they:

1. Restrict services for fossil fuel expansion, lethal autonomous weapons, and unacceptable surveillance practices like social scoring or biometric scraping.
2. Ensure political integrity by ending the obstruction of tech and climate regulations.
3. Implement independent oversight via external ethics councils to review high-risk client relationships.

ENDS

Photos and videosavailable from the Greenpeace Media Library.

Notes:

[1] Amazon’s virtual AGM is scheduled at 9:00 a.m. (Pacific Time)
[2] Norges Bank recommends the removal of oil stocks from the benchmark index of the Government Pension Fund Global (2017)
[3] Urgewald’s Global Coal Exit list: https://www.coalexit.org/ and https://gogel.org/
[4] Slippery slope: The arms industry and increasingly autonomous weapons) and Don’t be evil? A survey of the tech sector’s stance on lethal autonomous weapons – PAX (2019)
[5] Since this analysis relies exclusively on public data, these figures represent only the “tip of the iceberg” according to Greenpeace Germany’s research.
[6] Greenpeace Germany’s full report Amazon’s Toxic Web Services and Ethics Policy for Providers of Critical Digital Infrastructure — a landmark framework setting minimum environmental and ethical standards (May 2026)

Contacts:

Guillaumine Lickel, Deputy Communications Lead with Greenpeace International,
+33 (0) 6 73 89 48 90 (Central Europe timezone), glickel@greenpeace.org

Andi Nolten, Press Officer Consumption Revolution with Greenpeace Germany, +49 175-2083755, (Central Europe timezone), andi.nolte@greenpeace.org

Madison Carter, Greenpeace USA National Press Secretary, +1 703-554-4842
mcarter@greenpeace.org

Greenpeace International Press Desk, +31 (0)20 718 2470 (available 24 hours), pressdesk.int@greenpeace.org 

PDF
19.05.2026 à 16:59

Southern African floods: a disastrous case of climate inequality

Angelo Louw

Texte intégral (1796 mots)
Western Cape farm workers climbed onto the roofs of buildings during May 2026 floods in South Africa.
© NSRI

In recent weeks, severe winter storms tore through parts of my country, claiming at least 10 lives and devastating the lives of many of my fellow South Africans already living on the margins. From the flooded streets of major cities like Cape Town to informal and rural settlements left submerged under rising waters, thousands of families have watched their homes, belongings and any sense of security washed away. I watched the weather forecast closely as disaster unfurled in the provinces around mine; I wondered when the storm would hit us too.

Days of relentless rain, powerful winds and even snowfall battered provinces including the Western Cape, Eastern Cape, Free State and Mpumalanga. It forced our government to declare a national disaster for the second time this year. Schools closed, roads collapsed and entire communities were left stranded as floodwaters exposed the deep inequalities that continue to shape who suffers most during climate crises. For many, particularly those living in informal settlements and rural communities, extreme weather is not simply a natural disaster, it is a brutal reminder of how poverty and climate change collide to place the most vulnerable directly in harm’s way.

The extent of 2026 floods in Southern Africa

In the first quarter alone, heavy rains and devastating floods swept across Southern Africa, exposing our growing vulnerability to climate-driven disasters. Millions of people across my country and our neighbours (Madagascar,  Malawi, Mozambique, South Africa, Zambia and Zimbabwe) have been affected by severe flooding. Since December 2025, La Niña-induced heavy rainfall has impacted more than 2.36 million people

Two successive cyclones, Fytia and Gezani, tore through Madagascar and Mozambique, leaving behind destruction that claimed lives, displaced families and destroyed critical infrastructure and crops. In Mozambique alone, nearly 1.3 million people now require humanitarian assistance to cope with the subsequent displacement, healthcare crisis and food shortages. The increasing severity of climate extremes is no longer a distant warning, it is a lived reality for communities throughout the region. 

Food insecurity and malnutrition on the rise

As climate shocks intensify, food insecurity and malnutrition continue to tighten their grip on the region. The devastating imagery of submerged crops in South Africa’s agricultural provinces frightens me. I am well aware how floodwaters destroyed crops and disrupted already fragile food systems earlier this year, leaving behind numbers that are hard to read: an estimated 13.2 million people acutely food insecure and around 672,000 children suffering from severe malnutrition by the end of March. 

This crisis is unfolding within a volatile global economic climate that threatens tofurther deepen existing inequalities. Continued illegal attacks by the United States and Israel on Middle Eastern/West Asian countries have driven up oil prices; weakening exchange rates and limiting access to fertilisers ahead of the next planting season. For many Southern African countries already struggling with poverty and unemployment, these pressures could push basic food access even further out of reach. As it is, food costs since the beginning of this year have increased in my country at a rate double that of other first quarter inflation in previous years.  

Disease outbreaks stretch fragile healthcare systems

On top of this, disease outbreaks are compounding the pressure on already overstretched healthcare systems. Cholera outbreaks continue to spread across Angola and Mozambique, with recent flooding in Mozambique accelerating transmission and worsening sanitation conditions. Since January’s floods, it has recorded more than 9,000 cholera cases. We’ve also noticed a surge in malaria cases due to the heavy rains. 

These healthcare issues are exacerbated by further damage to the already failing healthcare infrastructure within the region, particularly in its rural communities. In communities already battling displacement, food shortages and inadequate healthcare infrastructure, the spread of infectious diseases further exposes the deep inequalities shaping the region’s experience of the climate crisis. Despite our disproportionate experiences of climate impacts, the region remains underfunded in its response efforts. Of the US$602 million requested for relief operations since January, only a quarter had been received.

Make polluters pay for their climate chaos

Southern Africa stands at the intersection of climate instability, inequality and fragile governance. And while these disasters are often framed as natural tragedies, their devastation is shaped by political choices, economic systems and a global failure to adequately confront the climate crisis. 

We need bold new taxes on the profits of the fossil fuel industries exacerbating extreme weather with their climate-wrecking operations. Revenue raised can be used in the Global Majority world, which is struggling to keep up with escalating needs – as these crises are no longer seasonal, but constant. For millions across Southern Africa, survival increasingly depends not only on the strength of communities, but on whether the world is willing to act before the next flood arrives. We demand a fast fair phase out of fossil fuels and we can not allow climate culprits to continue profiting off our suffering.  

Massive Drought in Romania. © Mihai Militaru / Greenpeace
Polluters Pay Pact

Sign the pact, record your story. Join the global movement to make polluters pay.

Join the movement

PDF
19.05.2026 à 14:47

I didn’t want a car, but then my local train station became a McDonald’s

Mihaela Bogeljić

Texte intégral (1676 mots)

I live in a tiny town, and I mean a few hundred people tiny, on the Croatian coast. Despite the size of my little corner of the world, we are lucky to have a lot of wonderful things. We have the beautiful Adriatic Sea, we have the sun, and we have what is left of our rich diverse natural environment. We also have the ‘joys’ of mass tourism, overdevelopment, and the scorching summer heat of the climate crisis.

However, there is one thing our town doesn’t have: a train.

The author attempting to board a train at Zadar Station, Croatia

My town is very close to Zadar, where we used to have a train station, but it closed down years ago. In its place, we got our first-ever McDonald’s. It is a jarring symbol of our shifting priorities – we have essentially traded a vital piece of public infrastructure which connected us to the rest of the country and to the rest of Europe, for a global fast-food drive-thru.

Zadar Station, pictured in 1997, and the McDonalds which replaced it, pictured in 2026

To be honest, that station had been barely clinging to life for years, with slow trains and poor connections. We were all hoping for something better – an upgraded, modern, fast, reliable train service. Instead, those possibilities were discarded, and the site was repurposed for commercial profit. 

For the people of Zadar County, this was a massive loss. Our towns became harder to travel between, it became much harder to reach a doctor in a bigger city, or offer a sustainable way for the thousands of tourists who visit us every year to get around and explore this beautiful region.

Roman Forum in Zadar, Croatia
© dronepicr / CC2.0

When you combine this with a bus system that is patchy and irregular (and non-existent at night), you realise you’ve lost more than just a convenient method of transport. You’ve lost access to social life, culture, and to freedom. Ultimately, despite never having wanted one, I was left with no choice but to buy a car.

I’m not even a ‘natural’ driver. While I’ve grown somewhat fond of my small car and my driving is quite good now, I never wanted the stress or financial or environmental cost of owning one. I didn’t buy a car as a luxury; I bought it as a ‘tax’ just to be able to visit friends and family, to be prepared in case of the need to travel to a larger city; in short – to live my life.

More Trains Less Cars Action in Vienna. © Mitja  Kobal / Greenpeace
Greenpeace Austria activists installed a 13 metre long train in front of the Austrian Federal Chancellery to call for more trains and less cars. The estimated cost of 5.9 billion Euros must be used to strengthen public transport instead of building relics from the fossil fuel past.
© Mitja Kobal / Greenpeace

However, there is a glimmer of hope on the horizon: the local government recently promised to revive Zadar’s train connections, with some works already underway and a completion date set for 2028. I truly hope these new tracks lead to a service that is fast, affordable, and accessible for everyone. We need more than just a track; we need a lifeline for students heading home, patients traveling to the capital for healthcare, and a sustainable way for tourists to explore our coast, without clogging up our streets, polluting our air or burning more fossil fuels in cars. 

My experience isn’t unique. I am not the only one trapped in this cycle.

A new report by the Oeko Institute confirms that my experience is a European reality. It shows that up to 56% of the population in European countries report not using public transport because it is unavailable, while roughly 19% experience ‘forced car ownership.’

Protest Train 9 € Ticket Berlin. © Gordon Welters / Greenpeace
2022 – Commuters protest the planned end of the €9 monthly public transport ‘climate ticket’, due to expire at the end of August. Greenpeace demands that a so-called climate ticket be introduced from 2023, for one euro per day.
© Gordon Welters / Greenpeace

This isn’t just an inconvenience; it’s a policy failure. The report outlines exactly what we need to do to ensure that we put people back at the centre of the conversation:

  • Make transport actually available. It’s not just about building tracks or buying buses; it’s about frequent, reliable connections. We need smart regional planning so that living in a small town doesn’t automatically mean you’re isolated and unconnected.
  • Make it safe and usable. Especially for many women and seniors, a lack of safety, or just physically difficult stops, is a huge barrier. We need better lighting, clear security protocols, and basic accessibility improvements to make sure everyone can actually use the system.
  • Keep it affordable. It’s simple: if it costs too much, people can’t use it. We need ‘social tickets’ and affordable ‘climate tickets‘ to ensure that a lack of money doesn’t trap people in their homes, and that their basic mobility needs are met. 
  • Stop ignoring the rural reality. Planners need to use real data to identify ‘high-need’ spots. We shouldn’t be forced into wasting hours on commutes – just because we live outside a city centre.
  • Support those who have no choice. Climate policies targeting fossil fuel cars are necessary, but they can’t be a trap for low-income households. If we are going to phase out older cars, we have to provide financial support and affordable, low-emission alternatives first.

We don’t need more fast food drive-thrus; we need a fair, connected Europe. This report isn’t just about data, it’s a call to make sure everyone has a basic right to move freely in a clean, safe, sustainable way.

Mihaela Bogeljić is the Communications Lead with the European Socio-Economic Campaign at Greenpeace International

PDF
19.05.2026 à 11:10

Up to 56% of population in European countries report being ‘cut off’ from public transport, new study finds 

Greenpeace International

Texte intégral (566 mots)

Vienna – Deep transport inequality across Europe is revealed by a new Oeko-Institut study commissioned by Greenpeace CEE, demonstrating how a lack of viable transit options effectively excludes many Europeans from vital public services and social infrastructure. 

Herwig Schuster, transport campaigner for Greenpeace Central and Eastern Europe, said: “It is a systemic failure that millions of people on the continent are effectively stranded, cut off from the jobs, healthcare, and opportunities they need to both survive and thrive. Transport is not a luxury, it is a fundamental bridge to a dignified life. We are calling on governments to prioritise a public transport system that is truly inclusive – affordable, accessible, safe, and reliable. It’s time to end transport poverty with a network that serves both the people and the planet.”

The report titled “Access Denied: Transport Poverty in Europe” reveals a stark reality: in roughly 90% of European countries, more than half the population does not use public transport regularly. Most significantly, up to 56% of the population in European countries report being effectively “cut off” from transit because it is simply unavailable in their area. This lack of alternatives leaves up to 19% of the population with no choice but to own a vehicle, compounding both household expenses and carbon emissions. The report also highlights a demographic divide: women and seniors are disproportionately affected by safety concerns and physical accessibility issues, often rendering public transit an unviable option. 

All analysed European countries perform below the European average on at least one of the 11 transport poverty indicators, with Germany, France, and Bulgaria exhibiting the most significant gaps. Czechia, Serbia and Slovakia are the countries with the most relatively best results for the indicators analysed. 

The report outlines a strategic roadmap to end transport poverty, centering on targeted social tickets, integrated regional and spatial planning, and safety-first infrastructure – such as enhanced lighting and emergency alarm systems – to ensure public transit is a viable, secure option for everyone. 

Nelly Unger and Dr. Viktoria Noka, researchers from the Oeko-Institut, said: “We need socially inclusive and climate friendly transport systems across Europe. This means making public transport more attractive: be it through targeted ticketing to improve affordability, integrated spatial and regional planning for better availability, additional safety and security protocols and barrier-free access, or targeted infrastructural investments to reduce time poverty. Where public transport is not an option, we need strong alignment between climate goals and social inclusion in our transport policies to ensure no one is left behind.” 

Greenpeace is advocating for this model of accessible, affordable and sustainable public transport, powered by ‘climate’ and ‘social’ tickets. We are calling for a fair tax on the super-rich to unlock the massive resources needed to turn this vision into a reality. 

 ENDS

Contacts:

Herwig Schuster, Campaigner European Socio-Economic Campaign, Greenpeace CEE, herwig.schuster@greenpeace.org, +43 664 4319214

Mihaela Bogeljić, Comms Lead European Socio-Economic Campaign, Greenpeace CEE, mihaela.bogeljic@greenpeace.org, +385922929265

Greenpeace International Press Desk, pressdesk.int@greenpeace.org, +31 20 718 2470 (24 hours)

PDF
4 / 10

🌱 Bon Pote
Actu-Environnement
Amis de la Terre
Aspas
Biodiversité-sous-nos-pieds

🌱 Bloom
Canopée
Décroissance (la)
Deep Green Resistance
Déroute des routes
Faîte et Racines
🌱 Printemps des Luttes Locales
F.N.E (AURA)
Greenpeace Fr
JNE
La Relève et la Peste
La Terre
Le Lierre
Le Sauvage
Low-Tech Mag.
Motus & Langue pendue
Mountain Wilderness
Negawatt
🌱 Observatoire de l'Anthropocène

🌱 Reporterre
Présages
Reclaim Finance
Réseau Action Climat
Résilience Montagne
SOS Forêt France
Stop Croisières

🌱 Terrestres

🌱 350.org
Vert.eco
Vous n'êtes pas seuls