Camila Garcez
In January 2023, the Brazilian government declared a public health emergency in Yanomami Land, the largest Indigenous territory in the country. Since then, progress has been made in both Indigenous health and protection of land, but traditional communities are still sending alerts about illegal mining. The Yanomami people have faced extreme malnutrition, diseases caused by illegal mining and a malaria epidemic, one of the biggest humanitarian crises in Brazilian history. Almost three years after the public health emergency was declared and following an emergency response plan, data shared by the Brazilian Ministry of Health demonstrated improved results: a decrease of 27.6% in deaths, an increase in health agents in the territory and the building of an Indigenous hospital. These initiatives led to a joint action between public authorities and Indigenous organisations and strengthened the Indigenous associations in not only denouncing invasions but giving assistance in monitoring land operations and demanding respect for their social and cultural dynamics. This cooperation has reinforced the process of withdrawal of illegal mining, making operations of Federal Police against them more effective and legitimate, as well as reaffirming that the protection of Indigenous territories is only possible with the active participation of their peoples, the real leaders in the defence of their lives, forests and cultural existence. New monitoring from Greenpeace Brazil of Yanomami Land showed improvements of monitored territories, with only 8.16 hectares of new areas opened for illegal gold exploitation in the period. The monitoring results revealed that miners were forced to retreat in all the Indigenous Lands that underwent operations coordinated by the Ministry of Indigenous Peoples. In comparison with the first half of 2024, there was a reduction of 95.18% in Yanomami’s territory and 41.53% in Munduruku territory. In Kayapó Indigenous land, despite an increase of 1.93%, there was no opening of new mining areas after the beginning of the de-intrusion in May, and in June 2025, the opening of new areas in the three territories reached zero. After the intrusion, we saw the water cleaning, the children returning to the village and more security. The withdrawal [of miners] is very good, but not just take out the mining, it is necessary to create economic alternatives for neighboring cities to the territory and for the youth. The fight against mining only works with coordinated, continuous and joint action. Mining tends to reinvent itself along with the growing international demand for gold, taking advantage of logistical gaps, clandestine routes and new technologies to explore protected territories. But the Toxic Gold report from Greenpeace Brazil shows the challenges are far from over. Researchers discovered a decrease in forest devastation in many Indigenous Lands but an increase in others as it happened in Sararé Indigenous land, with 93% from 2023 to 2024. The report also found discrepancies in gold trade data. In 2024 alone, the price of gold rose by 44%, and many central banks declared their intent to stock up on gold reserves. Despite the initiatives in Yanomami lands, mining cannot continue to destroy lives, rivers, forests and cultures. The struggle for survival of the Yanomami people is also the struggle for the Amazon, for the climate and for the future of all. Camila Garcez is a Campaigner with Greenpeace Brazil. Texte intégral (1094 mots)
Cooperation meets solutions

To support the Yanomami people fight illegal mining, in 2024 the Brazilian government created the “Casa de Governo Yanomami”, to coordinate and monitor the implementation of the Plan for Deinterference and Coping with the Humanitarian Crisis in the Yanomami Indigenous Land in Roraima state. Since then, more than 9 thousand operations tackled illegal mining and more than R$644 million Brazilian reais (US$112 million) in losses for the illegal mining market.First victories
In a meeting between Greenpeace Brasil and Indigenous leaderships from all three Indigenous groups to go over the results of the monitoring, Julio Ye’kwana Yanomami highlighted the positive impacts of operations and pointed to structural changes needed to contain mining.
Gold: a persistent threat

Greenpeace International
Brussels – As the European Union (EU) ministers rubber-stamp the EU’s ban on imports of Russian gas, Greenpeace Belgium activists warn them not to replace Putin’s gas with Trump’s. The activists inflated 10-metre-long representations of Putin and Trump sitting on a gas tanker in front of the EU Council headquarters, to symbolise Europe’s dependence on fossil fuel imports from autocrats. An average of two to three tankers carrying liquefied gas from the United States (US) arrive in Europe every day, according to new calculations. Photos are available in the Greenpeace Media Library. Lisa Göldner, fossil fuel campaigner from Greenpeace Germany: “Europe’s strength goes hand in hand with energy independence. The more Europe depends on the United States for energy, the greater the vulnerability to pressure by Trump. Every euro spent on US gas strengthens Trump’s authoritarian agenda at home and imperialist ambitions abroad. The only way for Europe to protect its political independence and achieve true energy security is to phase out fossil gas and accelerate the shift to a fully renewable energy system.” “Banning Russian gas is long overdue and absolutely the right decision. But Europe cannot celebrate breaking free from Putin while locking itself into a new dependency on Trump’s fossil gas,” Göldner adds. Since Trump’s second inauguration on 20 January 2025, EU countries have imported US gas estimated to be worth €28 billion according to a new Greenpeace calculation. Amid repeated threats from Trump against Europe, more than 60 tankers of US gas have arrived in Europe since the start of 2026 alone.[1] The EU’s reliance on the US for gas imports is set to grow. In 2025, EU countries sourced 57% of their liquefied gas imports from the US, a share that could rise to 80% by 2030, according to a recent analysis by IEEFA.[2] Greenpeace is calling on the EU to withdraw from the commitment to import USD750 billion worth of US energy, mainly fossil gas, by 2028, and to immediately halt all negotiations for new purchase agreements with US gas suppliers.[3] Greenpeace is also asking the EU for a plan to end dependence on US gas and terminate existing long-term supply contracts earlier, as well as additional measures to reduce Europe’s gas demand and accelerate the transition to homegrown renewable energy. Since Russia’s full scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, Greenpeace organisations around Europe have blocked shipments of Russian oil and gas – in Finland; in Britain; in Belgium (Zeebrugge and Antwerp); in Denmark; in Italy. Greenpeace France also blocked the installation of a liquified gas terminal in Le Havre, warning it could be used to import Russian gas, and Greenpeace Spain shut down a gas power plant in Malaga burning gas from Russia. ENDS Notes Photos are available in the Greenpeace Media Library. [1] According to data extracted from LSEG Data & Analytics on 23 January 2026, from 1 to 23 January 2026, 61 US gas tankers arrived in EU countries. Between 20 January 2025 (Trump’s second inauguration) and 20 January 2026, EU countries imported 82.3 billion m3 of US gas, with an estimated value of €28 billion, based on the daily gas spot market price on the date of arrival as represented in the Dutch TTF Natural Gas Futures. [2] EU risks new energy dependence as US could supply 80% of its LNG imports by 2030 | IEEFA Contacts Manon Laudy, fossil fuels press officer, Greenpeace Belgium: +336 49 15 69 83, mlaudy@greenpeace.org Greenpeace International Press Desk, +31 (0)20 718 2470 (available 24 hours), pressdesk.int@greenpeace.org Texte intégral (780 mots)
Anna Diski and Sarah King
Every day, the plastic pollution crisis worsens, especially in countries flooded with single-use sachets pushed by fast-moving consumer goods companies. But while the crisis grows, communities in Manila, Philippines are proving that a different future is not only possible but already operational. Reuse at scale isn’t a distant ambition. It’s happening right now, despite the companies still profiting from the status quo. The plastics crisis didn’t arrive by accident. Sachets were designed, marketed, and aggressively expanded by multinationals like Unilever as a way to sell small volumes at huge margins. It’s a system built for profit, not sustainability. Unilever alone sells an estimated 53 billion plastic sachets every year. That’s 1,700 pieces of single-use plastic every second, pushed into countries whose waste systems cannot handle them. Sachets persist not because people love them, but because companies refuse to provide alternatives. That deliberate choice has consequences: mountains of waste, blocked waterways, toxic burning, and a rubbish system overwhelmed by volume. Reuse is a system-wide solution to the sachet problem and communities in the Philippines are already showing how. The Kuha sa Tingi initiative, built by Greenpeace Philippines with local governments and community partners, transforms neighbourhood sari-sari stores into refill hubs for everyday items like dishwashing liquid, detergent, and shampoo, eliminating the need for single-use sachets. The Philippines uses an estimated 164 million sachets daily. Kuha sa Tingi offers a scalable alternative. Beginning in Quezon City and San Juan City, it is now expanding across the region through new partnerships. In Quezon City and San Juan City, these neighbourhood stores are quietly reshaping how everyday goods are sold. Kuha sa Tingi and enterprises across Asia and Africa are proving that reuse can outperform sachets economically, socially, and environmentally. This is the environment Unilever claims requires sachets for affordability and access. Yet the success of Kuha sa Tingi proves that argument is outdated and indefensible. If sari-sari stores can run refill systems that benefit consumers and businesses alike, what excuse does a global corporation with Unilever’s resources have? Reuse works in emerging markets, in dense urban settings, and in communities long targeted with sachet-heavy marketing. The only place it ‘doesn’t work’, it seems, is inside boardrooms clinging to a profitable but destructive model. Unilever has the influence, distribution power and capital to make reuse mainstream. These models are ready for corporate investment. A shift to reuse would: Yet Unilever continues pushing billions of sachets into the market while community-led solutions flourish. That’s more than a missed opportunity – it’s an active choice to sustain harm. No company can claim sustainability leadership while driving one of the world’s most polluting packaging formats. Cities, communities, consumers and small businesses are moving reuse forward. What’s missing is the commitment from the companies driving the sachet problem to phase out sachets and phase in reuse models. Unilever should be: Innovation is not the limiting factor here. Corporate will is. It’s time for Unilever to join it – and time to leave the sachet era behind. Anna Diski is a Senior Campaigner from Greenpeace UK. Sarah King is a Senior Strategist for the Plastic Free Future campaign from Greenpeace Canada. Texte intégral (1955 mots)

The Problem: Sachet Pollution Is a System Choice

The Proof: Reuse in Action in Metro Manila
What the project is

Key outcomes
Why this matters for Unilever

The Opportunity for Unilever

Unilever Must Join the Movement
Greenpeace International
A creative week in the Greenpeace world, with murals around the globe celebrating the ratification of the Global Oceans Treaty, as well as people power in the streets of Washington D.C, London, and Berlin. Greenpeace has been a pioneer of photo activism for more than 50 years, and remains committed to bearing witness and exposing environmental injustice through the images we capture. To see more Greenpeace photos and videos, visit our Media Library. Texte intégral (1498 mots)

USA – Protesters gather near the White House on the one year anniversary of the Trump inauguration. January 20, 2026 marks one year of the second Trump administration.

Germany – Andreas Demko and Aurélien Pinder are creating a mural based on the story of Sadako Sasaki, victim of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima. She was diagnosed with leukaemia and began folding 1,000 paper cranes in order to regain her health. According to Japanese legend, cranes are considered a symbol of good luck, and Sadako’s story made them a global symbol of hope and peace. The mural is a further development of Daniel Ebert’s artwork.

U.K. – An electric advan, hired by Greenpeace UK, circles Westminster in London, to highlight the death and violence still happening in Gaza despite 100 days of the ceasefire. The government must stop selling weapons to Israel now.

Austria – Greenpeace Austria works with artist Gernot Passath to create a mural in Graz to celebrate the Global Ocean Treaty coming into force on the 17th January 2026.

Germany – Greenpeace activists and volunteers march in the annual ‘We have had enough!’ protest for a more sustainable agriculture in Berlin. The environmental activists take to the streets with the Greenpeace pig, bee, banners, balloons and signs.

U.K. – The Greenpeace sailing vessel Witness arrives in London

Australia – To celebrate the Global Ocean Treaty formally entering into force on Saturday 17 January 2026, Greenpeace Australia unveils a large scale mural in Brisbane, Australia by award-winning artist Gus Eagleton.
Bon Pote
Actu-Environnement
Amis de la Terre
Aspas
Biodiversité-sous-nos-pieds
Bloom
Canopée
Décroissance (la)
Deep Green Resistance
Déroute des routes
Faîte et Racines
Fracas
F.N.E (AURA)
Greenpeace Fr
JNE
La Relève et la Peste
La Terre
Le Lierre
Le Sauvage
Low-Tech Mag.
Motus & Langue pendue
Mountain Wilderness
Negawatt
Observatoire de l'Anthropocène