When we talk about the climate crisis, fossil fuel giants like Shell or Exxon usually take the spotlight. But there is another titan of industry driving dangerous climate destruction and it is currently setting its sights on a massive expansion in Africa.

Meet JBS: the world’s largest meat company, and the biggest climate threat you have never heard of.

To grasp the sheer scale of JBS, consider this: it has the capacity to slaughter around 76,000 cows, 14 million chickens, 147,000 pigs, and 23,500 lambs every single day. Its methane emissions are estimated to exceed the combined livestock emissions of France, Germany, Canada, and New Zealand.

For decades, JBS has been the market leader in Brazil’s beef industry, which is the primary engine behind the destruction of the Amazon rainforest. In addition to being directly implicated in corruption scandals, JBS has through its supply chain relationships, been linked to severe human rights abuses and to cattle grazed illegally on indigenous lands. Now, to line the pockets of its billionaire shareholders, it is exporting this toxic model of extraction to a new frontier: Sub-Saharan Africa.

A US$2.5 billion corporate secret

Half of JBS’ predatory US$6 billion global expansion has been earmarked for Nigeria, and they have signed an agreement with the Nigerian government to build six massive meat-processing plants. At least 1.2 million hectares of land has already been committed to the project. An area larger than some small nations is slated for conversion into large-scale industrial farming.

The catch? Secrecy.

JBS has failed to disclose significant information about its plans, from the agreement it signed with Nigeria’s government to environmental and human rights impact assessments. In a region where traditional pastoralism supports over 20 million people, this isn’t just a business deal; it’s a direct threat to food sovereignty, human dignity, and local livelihoods.

Local communities and civil society groups in Nigeria are resisting, demanding transparency and raising serious concerns about the future of the land, including dispossession, mass displacement and disruption of their pastoralist way of life. Now Greenpeace Africa has escalated the issue as part of a recent submission to the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights. Specifically drawing attention to JBS’ shady expansion plans in Nigeria, the filing argues that governments and corporations alike have a binding duty under the African Charter to prevent harm and ensure public participation and access to information. States must hold corporate actors legally accountable for the actions of their subsidiaries.

We won’t sit idly by and watch this happen. I count on you to join us and help force JBS’s plans into the light.

Multinational corporations like JBS thrive by operating in the dark. They want to quietly build their empires in back rooms while leaving local communities to deal with the consequences: polluted air, drained water sources, and an unstable climate.

Why a secret in Nigeria matters everywhere

You might be reading this in Madrid, Mexico City, or Auckland, thinking Nigeria feels a world away. But Big Agriculture’s playbook and impact is global, and so is our resistance. The global meat and dairy industry is rigged by a handful of corporate giants, and stopping them requires global solidarity.

• Pulling the climate emergency brake: Methane is over 80 times more potent than CO2 in the short term. JBS sees Nigeria as a gateway to rolling out its destructive industrial farm model across the entire continent and beyond. By standing in solidarity with Nigerian civil society, we can protect our shared climate from being pushed beyond irreversible tipping points.

• Setting a precedent for accountability: All over the world, agribusiness lobbyists are using their economic muscle to roll back environmental regulations, trading public health for corporate profit. By stopping JBS’ predatory expansion in Africa, we set a global benchmark: no corporation is too big to be held to account, and no community can be pushed out in secret.

Are you ready to demand transparency from JBS?

We have already seen first-hand the devastation fossil fuel companies like Shell cause to our climate, our environment and human rights. Now, JBS is gearing up to follow.

History shows us that corporate giants will not change until people power forces them to. The strategy of Big Ag relies on undue political influence, greenwash, corruption and extreme secrecy to lock in a future of industrial overproduction and corporate extraction, which generates profits for wealthy shareholders at the expense of people and nature. But we are fighting for a renewed future. One where food is for people, not for corporate profit.

True food sovereignty requires halting this expansion to ensure local communities retain sovereignty over their land. Local communities in Nigeria are already rising up. Now, we need people like you to help force JBS’s plans into the light – and stop a new wave of destruction before it starts. 

Amanda Larsson is Global Campaign Lead for Agriculture, Greenpeace Aotearoa.  

Santa Marta, Colombia – Greenpeace is urging governments attending the Santa Marta conference to seize the current energy supply crisis amid the war on Iran to accelerate a just transition to renewable energy that protects people and builds long-term climate and energy stability. 

At the midway point of the conference, Greenpeace Colombia activists displayed a message on the Malecon de Bastidas beach in Santa Marta saying: ’Renewables Power Peace’ and called on the attending countries to ‘End Fossil Fuels’. Activists also displayed small windmills to symbolise the potential and reliability of renewable energy. 

Rodrigo Estrada, Senior Climate Advisor, Greenpeace International said: “Phasing out oil, gas and coal means phasing in stability and Santa Marta can accelerate a just transition away from fossil fuels. In contrast to the dangerous energy supply crisis, the conference shows there’s light on the horizon and that energy solutions for a viable future are achieved through cooperation rather than conflict. Now it’s time for the Santa Marta coalition of committed states to put words into action.”

To coincide with the First International Conference on Transitioning Away from Fossil Fuels in Santa Marta, Greenpeace International has produced a policy briefing outlining the core elements of a just transition and the urgent, priority actions needed from national governments and through global co-operation to make it a reality.[1] Greenpeace will also have a delegation of climate and energy policy experts on site in Santa Marta.

Laura Caicedo, Campaigns Coordinator, Greenpeace Colombia said: “Colombia has everything it needs to lead an energy transition based on solar and wind power. This potential is a real opportunity to move toward a more just model, with community participation and tangible benefits for people. But for this to happen, we need global finance to be unlocked so that a national roadmap can be implemented. In a context of global crisis and instability, diversifying our energy mix is not only a climate necessity, it is key to strengthening the country’s economic resilience and reducing dependence on fossil fuels.”

Shiva Gounden, Head of Pacific, Greenpeace Australia Pacific said: “As illegal wars and political power plays choke the world’s energy supply, Pacific communities are again bearing the brunt of a crisis they did not create. We come together in Santa Marta at an historic turning point – a moment of great disruption but also opportunity to free ourselves from the fossil fuel stranglehold by transitioning towards clean, homegrown renewables. This is no longer just a climate necessity, it is the path to global peace and energy security, and the safe future of communities around the world.”

Anna Cárcamo, Climate Politics Specialist at Greenpeace Brazil said: “The transition away from fossil fuels is urgent, and it must be just. For it to be just, there must be provision of quality finance from developed countries to developing countries to implement these transitions and measures to guarantee human rights, job security, resilience, equitable energy access and effective participation. The Roadmap to transition away from fossil fuels led by the COP30 Presidency and the Santa Marta Conference provide opportunities to drive this transition to a new system, one that protects people and nature and benefits local communities and territories in the Global South, rather than reproducing colonial extractivist models”.

ENDS

Photos are available in the Greenpeace Media Library. 

Notes:
[1] A Just Transition Away from Fossil Fuels: Policy Briefing

Contact:

Greenpeace International Press Desk, +31 (0)20 718 2470 (available 24 hours), pressdesk.int@greenpeace.org

Kyiv, Ukraine – Forty years after the Chornobyl disaster spread radioactive contamination across Europe, the risks it exposed have evolved in a world shaped by war, geopolitical tension and more frequent extreme weather, where the vulnerability of nuclear power is abundantly clear.

The Russian full-scale invasion of Ukraine has brought these risks into sharp focus, with nuclear power stations operating in warzones where critical infrastructure is targeted, underscoring the challenges of relying on large, centralised energy systems in an increasingly unstable environment.

“Forty years after the start of the Chornobyl disaster, we are still living its consequences. The severe risks from nuclear power demonstrated by Chornobyl are being deliberately used by Russia as a weapon of war,” Polina Kolodiazhna, Senior Campaigner from Greenpeace Ukraine said. 

“Nuclear power stations have inherent risks, and those risks are escalating. Russia, for the first time in the history of warfare, has systematically attacked and occupied nuclear plants showing how they can be used as military and political tools. In a world at war, with massive geopolitical tension and climate extremes, those risks are increasing.”

At the same time, decentralised renewable energy systems are showing a different model of resilience. Since the start of the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, solar power combined with battery storage has helped keep hospitals, schools and municipalities functioning during blackouts. These systems are harder to disable, faster to repair, and continue to generate electricity even when parts of the grid are damaged.

One such example is the green Outpatient Clinic in Horenka, a village near Kyiv. After the Russian occupation of the Kyiv region caused massive damage, the clinic was rebuilt and equipped with a hybrid solar system and a heat pump. Olena Yuzvak, Director of the Green Outpatient Clinic in Horenka said renewable energy had made the vital facility “independent”.

“We can now serve all our patients, no matter the Russian attacks on the energy system,” she said. “But we became far more than “just” a green outpatient clinic. During energy shortages, people come to us for medical help but also to simply charge their phones or have a hot cup of tea. Horenka Clinic is a lifeline during blackouts.” 

The clinic also serves as a blueprint for a secure energy system that ensures Ukraine remains in control of its own power, through crisis and peace.[1] 

But while decentralised systems are strengthening resilience on the ground, the risks associated with large, centralised nuclear infrastructure have not diminished. A new analysis commissioned by Greenpeace Ukraine finds that the primary functions of the New Safe Confinement (NSC), which contains the Sarcophagus and ruins of Chornobyl reactor unit 4,  have been severely compromised as a consequence of last year’s Russian dronestrike.[2]

Repairing the NSC is a priority due to the hazards posed by the radioactive materials inside, but continuation of Russia’s war is a direct threat to these efforts. One design function of the NSC is to use enormous cranes to dismantle the Sarcophagus while preventing radioactive materials from escaping into the environment.

“The drone attack on the New Safe Confinement was a Russian-made war crime. After 40 years, the Chornobyl Sarcophagus is vulnerable and decades past its design life. The damage to the New Safe Confinement means years of repairs and further delays before the Sarcophagus can be safely dismantled,” Greenpeace Ukraine nuclear expert Shaun Burnie said.

“Greenpeace has a simple and clear message: Russia must be stopped from weaponising nuclear power plants. There is a clear contradiction in EU policy when on the one hand it supports Ukraine while on the other it continues nuclear trade with Rosatom, which directly funds Russia’s war against Ukraine. Full sanctions that end European nuclear business with Russia should be a European security priority.”

Forty years after the Chornobyl disaster, the lesson is clear: nuclear risk is long lasting and difficult to contain. In today’s unstable world, that risk is increasing. Safer, more resilient energy systems are already available. Governments should prioritise decentralised renewable energy to strengthen security, reduce vulnerability and build a more stable energy future.

ENDS

Photos and video available in the Greenpeace Media Library: 

• Historic images of the Chornobyl site and ongoing impact of the nuclear disaster 
• Images from April 2026, Greenpeace visit to Chornobyl Nuclear Power Station

Notes:

[1] Background information on Greenpeace Ukraine’s green reconstruction project
[2] Greenpeace report on impact of Russian drone attack on New Safe Confinement at Chornobyl nuclear power station that describes the potential risk of a collapse

Contacts:

Theresa Gral, Greenpeace Central- and Eastern Europe Communications, theresa.gral@greenpeace.org, +43 650 375 1987 (Signal, Whatsapp)

Martin Zavan, Communications Specialist, Greenpeace International, mzavan@greenpeace.org +61 424 295 422 (Signal, Whatsapp)

List of available spokespeople for this issue available here

Greenpeace International Press Desk: +31 (0)20 718 2470 (available 24 hours), pressdesk.int@greenpeace.org 

On this day 40 years ago, an explosion at reactor 4 at the Chornobyl nuclear power station released radioactive contamination across Europe, forcing entire communities to abandon their homes, and leaving a toxic legacy that endures to this day. The consequences did not end as the story faded from the headlines. Lives and livelihoods were lost, land remains uninhabitable, and the clean-up continues to carry enormous human and financial costs. This is not simply a commemoration of a past event, 40 years later, this is an ongoing nuclear emergency.

Today, the impacts continue to play out in an increasingly unstable world. Since the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine, nuclear infrastructure has been exposed to the realities of modern warfare. Nuclear power stations have been attacked and occupied, and critical systems placed under immense pressure. As Greenpeace Ukraine Senior Campaigner, Polina Kolodiazhna said “Forty years after the start of the Chornobyl disaster, we are still living its consequences. The severe risks from nuclear power demonstrated by Chornobyl are being deliberately used by Russia as a weapon of war.”

Nuclear power remains the biggest source of electricity in Ukraine. But the context has changed. In a world shaped by war, geopolitical tension and intensifying extreme weather, large centralised energy systems are exposed. When things go wrong, the consequences are systemic and enduring.

There is however, another side to the story, that shows what is already possible and points to a better future.

Across Ukraine, decentralised renewable energy is already performing well under pressure. Solar power and battery storage has kept hospitals, schools and communities functioning during blackouts caused by Russian attacks on electricity infrastructure. Renewable systems are harder to disable, quicker to repair, and continue generating even when parts of the grid are damaged. 

In Horenka, near Kyiv, a damaged outpatient clinic was rebuilt, with Greenpeace Ukraine support, with a hybrid solar system and heat pump instead of gas. Its director, Olena Yuzvak, said that means patients can be tended to despite Russian attacks. “But we became far more than ‘just’ a green outpatient clinic,” she said. “During energy shortages, people come to us for medical help but also to simply charge their phones or have a hot cup of tea. The Horenka Clinic is a lifeline.” 

This is what resilience looks like

Distributed renewable energy systems reduce vulnerability because they don’t concentrate risk in a single point of failure. They can be deployed quickly, scaled flexibly and rapidly restored. That matters in a volatile environment.

By contrast, the risks of nuclear power remain, including at Chornobyl. A new analysis commissioned by Greenpeace Ukraine reveals that the primary functions of the New Safe Confinement (NSC), which contains the Sarcophagus and ruins of Chornobyl reactor unit 4,  have been severely compromised as a consequence of last year’s deliberate, Russian drone strike. The assessment concludes that its ability to perform its containment role has been compromised, raising concerns about the potential release of radioactive material.

Inside the damaged reactor and its original shelter lies a complex mix of radioactive dust, fuel remnants and debris. The NSC was designed to enable the safe dismantling of these materials while preventing contamination from escaping. With that function impaired, the risks become harder to manage, particularly amid war.

Greenpeace nuclear specialist Shaun Burnie has warned that the situation increases the danger of radioactive material being released if structural failure occurs, highlighting how conflict amplifies the long-term risks of nuclear disaster. This is one of the key lessons of Chornobyl and should serve as a warning. The consequences of a nuclear disaster are not confined to a single moment. They endure, evolve and can be exacerbated by new pressures, such as war or extreme weather.

The question of accountability

Russian forces continue to threaten nuclear facilities in Ukraine and systematically attack the Ukraine grid. This could lead – in a worst case scenario – to multiple emergency failures at Ukraine’s nuclear reactors and the release of catastrophic levels of radioactivity, even beyond what we have seen at the Chornobyl disaster forty years ago. At the same time, the Russian state nuclear corporation, Rosatom, continues to play a key role in global energy markets by exporting technology and nuclear fuel. Reducing dependency on Rosatom is not just an energy issue, but one of international security.

Continuing to rely on nuclear systems tied to geopolitical risk, whether through fuel supply, technology or infrastructure, leaves countries exposed to political, economic and security pressures that go well beyond energy policy.

The lesson of Chornobyl is not only about what can go wrong, but about what it costs when it does, across borders, generations, and under conditions that are more volatile than ever.

The choice is not abstract. It is playing out now.

Governments can continue to invest in centralised systems that concentrate risk and deepen geopolitical dependence. Or they can accelerate the shift to decentralised renewable energy that is safer, more resilient and harder to weaponise.