flux Ecologie

▸ les 10 dernières parutions

03.02.2026 à 08:04

An oil and gas corporation killing winters with its planet-heating pollution is sponsoring the Winter Olympics. Could it be Eni more ironic?

Federico Spadini

Texte intégral (2088 mots)

We all want a world where winters remain a source of joy. A world where professional athletes and amateurs alike can count on snow and ice to pursue their passions, where children can play in the snow, and where iconic, international sporting events, like the Winter Olympics and Paralympics, continue to take place and inspire people. 

But the snowy scenes that provided a backdrop to so many of cherished childhood memories in Italy are under threat. The Games require the right set of conditions for competition to be safe and fair, and those very conditions are under threat from fossil fuel corporations, such as Italian oil and gas giant Eni, and their planet-heating operations. 

Now, in the days leading up to the 2026 Winter Olympics Milano Cortina, Greenpeace Italy has released a hard-hitting video that aims to cut through the noise and expose the threat that fossil fuels and the Games major sponsor, Eni, in particular, pose to the future of the Winter Olympics and Paralympics.

Oilympics: calling out Eni’s greenwashing 

The ‘Oilympics’ film shines a spotlight on Eni’s role in fuelling the climate crisis while highlighting our demand that the International Olympic Committee (IOC) ban all fossil fuel advertising and sponsorship, in order to protect the future of winter sports, and stop polluters from hijacking the Olympic spirit.

Winter Olympics 2026 video frame
Oilympics: The Games on Thin Ice

Fossil fuel companies are greenwashing their image by sponsoring big sporting events to hide their destruction. Don’t let them get away with it.

Add your name

The short film exposes the irony of a company that is melting winter, sponsoring the Winter Games. 

Oil and gas corporations are driving the climate crisis, and at this rate by the 2080s over half of suitable locations will be unable to host the Winter Olympics. And Eni’s planet-heating pollution has a central role in this dour forecast. One year of Eni’s fossil fuel emissions could melt enough glacier ice to fill 2.5 million Olympic swimming pools. 

But the impacts go much further. Eni is currently suing Greenpeace Italy because it stated Eni harms people, after Greenpeace Netherlands calculated that Eni’s self-reported 2022 emissions could cause 27,000 excess deaths due to increased temperature alone before the end of the century. This was published in a 2023 study by Greenpeace Netherlands based on a peer-reviewed methodology.

Who really pays for Eni’s greenwashing?

Given all of that, it’s no surprise that Eni actively seeks to hide these truths from the public, reportedly spending tens of millions of dollars on sporting sponsorships to soften its image. Buying an artificial association with the 2026 Winter Olympics in Milan and Cortina is part of that deceptive and cynical greenwashing strategy.

Fossil fuel corporations, like Eni, should pay for the damage they cause, not buy reputational cover by associating themselves with Olympic values of excellence, respect, and friendship. 

Greenpeace supporters, nature lovers and the winter sports community are united in our desire to protect the Winter Olympics and Paralympics for present and future generations. The Olympic values of respect for people and the environment matter. Allowing Eni to use the Games as a billboard for greenwashing undermines those values and threatens the future of the event the IOC claims to support. 

Eni and the fossil fuel industry are driving climate change, which is jeopardising mountain communities already struggling with a rapidly changing climate, the livelihoods of many people who rely on cold winters, and the 60 million Europeans who ski every year.

How do we stop oil corporations like Eni?

A better future is still within reach. The International Olympic Committee (IOC) can help lead the shift away from fossil fuels by refusing to be complicit in the deceptive practices of corporations like Eni who are stealing the winters that form the backdrop to so many precious childhood memories. This has happened before with tobacco advertising. Once the scientific consensus on the harms of smoking became too strong to ignore, the IOC banned tobacco advertising ahead of the 1988 Winter Olympics in Calgary. It played a key role in denormalising cigarette advertisements and set a strong precedent that was followed by sporting bodies and other event organisers around the world. It serves as a powerful testament to the power of the IOC to help shape policy at a global level and it shows that the same can be done with fossil fuel sponsorship and advertising.

When iconic and influential sporting and cultural organisations like the Olympics choose integrity over greenwashing, they revoke polluters’ license to mislead and force them to face the harms they cause. That’s why Greenpeace is taking on fossil fuel corporations like Eni that are stealing our winters by shrinking snow seasons, collapsing glaciers and threatening the sports and traditions that millions of people cherish.

Greenpeace is calling for the IOC to drop oil and gas sponsorship from the Winter Olympic and Paralympic Games, and commit to ending fossil fuel sponsorship across all Olympic Games. It benefits no one but oil and gas corporations; it distracts everyone from the environmental destruction they cause and the communities they harm and helps them avoid accountability. 

Winter Olympics 2026 video frame
Oilympics: The Games on Thin Ice

Fossil fuel companies are greenwashing their image by sponsoring big sporting events to hide their destruction. Don’t let them get away with it.

Add your name

Eni should be paying for the damage they have caused, not using sponsorships to polish their image while driving the climate crisis that threatens the future of winter sport.

A future of icy cold winters with dependable snow is still possible, but like a glacier in the climate crisis, it’s melting before our eyes. Protecting the climate requires us to take on the forces that are destroying our winters and everything we love about them. That future is still possible if we change course now.

Federico Spadini is a Greenpeace Italy Campaigner based in Milan, Italy.

PDF
03.02.2026 à 08:01

The climate crisis and the future of the Winter Olympics

Sophie Allain

Texte intégral (2750 mots)

More than half of the potential host cities Winter Games will be “climate-unreliable” by the 2080s! That’s the verdict of a rigorous 2024 scientific study funded by the International Olympic Committee (IOC) itself, confirming the importance of reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

Experts Robert Steiger and Daniel Scott examined three different emissions scenarios and analysed the impacts on the weather in cities that could potentially host the Winter Olympics. They looked at the temperature and depth of snow. The results serve as a stark warning. 

Under the mid-range emission scenario (which is considered the most likely scenario), only 46 out of the 93 locations they looked into will be “climate reliable”. This means that there are far fewer places in the future where athletes could compete safely and fairly. 

Fake snow and cancelations 

This does not come as a surprise – in an earlier study the same researchers found that among 21 previous host cities, only one is projected  to be reliable by the end of the century if global emissions remain on the trajectory of the past two decades. But this is not solely a problem for the future. In 2022, the Beijing Winter Olympics set a precedent as the first games to use 100% artificial snow

And the impacts of climate change on winter sports are not limited to the Olympics. The 2022/2023 Ski World Cup season started with warm weather and lack of snow, resulting in the International Ski Federation (FIS) cancelling or postponing seven out of first eight scheduled races. 

Safety 

These incidents, plus a lack of snow for practice sessions, more injuries and reduced climate reliability of host cities, led over 500 athletes to sign an open letter demanding the FIS take greater climate action, with Greenpeace International lending support. This led the FIS to implement a series of reforms on Winter Olympic viability, nonetheless, the impact of fossil fuels remains. 

In a participant perspective survey involving around 400 Winter Olympic athletes, over 95% stated that climate change is/will negatively impact their sport, and winter sport culture in general by reducing training opportunities for the next-generation.

The problem with “sportwashing”

Fossil fuel corporations use sports sponsorships to “polish” their image. They want us to see their logo next to world-class athletes to distract from how their business is driving the climate crisis that threatens those very sports.

One such corporation is the Italian oil and gas giant, Eni, which is sponsoring the 2026 Winter Olympics and Paralympics in Milano and Cortina. That’s right, a company that is driving the climate crisis and putting winter sports at risk is using the Games to distract the public from its destructive impact.

And much like the climate, the battle is heating up. Eni is currently in a legal battle with Greenpeace Italy.

In 2023, Greenpeace Netherlands released a study applying the Mortality Cost of Carbon method, which projected that Eni’s self-reported emissions for 2022 alone could cause 27,000 temperature-related excess deaths by the end of the century. Instead of changing their business, Eni attempted to silence these legitimate criticisms by suing Greenpeace Italy. Lawyers call this a SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) but in layman’s terms this is legal bullying and intimidation.

Two images, one on top of the other, show comparative sizes of a glacier. The two images - one in colour and one black and white - are taken from the exact same angle, and both feature two hikers resting on the ground, in the same position. In the black and white image, the glacier is much more visible in the distance than in the modern, colour version.
Top: Historical image by geologist Anders K. Orvin in 1924, with the glaciers Kongsbreen, Kronobreen and Kongsvegen surrounding Collethøgda Island. Bottom: Image taken at the same location by photographer Christian Aslund. 26th August 2024
© Christian Åslund / Norwegian Polar Institute / Greenpeace

Doing the maths: Emissions and glaciers

To better understand the impact Eni’s emissions could have on ice, take a look at Eni’s own company reports. In 2024, Eni reported NET Greenhouse Gas lifecycle emissions of 395 million metric tonnes CO2e.

Attribution science is becoming more and more accurate at estimating likely future harms from today’s carbon emissions. The shrinking of glaciers, for example, is widely accepted as evidence of climate change. Glacier mass loss has been reported to be related to temperature increase, which is known to have a direct relationship with cumulative carbon emissions. Scientific modelling shows that for every 1 kg of CO2 we put into the air, we eventually lose about 15.8 kg (5.9–20.5 kg) of glacier ice.

When you apply that maths to the equivalent of Eni’s 2024 emissions, we are looking at a potential committed loss of 6.2 (2.3–8.1) billion tonnes of glacier ice over time.

Trying to visualise the damage

That’s a huge number, so let’s break it down into something we can see: Olympic-sized swimming pools.

  • A standard Olympic pool holds 2,500 m3 of water.
  • The glacier ice projected to be lost because of emissions equivalent to those reported by Eni for 2024 alone could fill almost 2.5 million pools (2,496,400 to be exact).
Olympic Swimming Pool, Montreal. An Olympic swimming pool is 50 metres (164 ft) long, 25 metres (82 ft) wide, and at least 2 metres deep (typically 3 meters).
© Wikimedia Commons/Cameron Brow

Imagine two and a half million swimming pools lined up – that’s the equivalent to the projected impact of one year of one company’s emissions.

How you can help to hold oil and gas corporations accountable

If these estimates shock you, you aren’t alone. We need to protect the future of winter sports by holding polluters accountable. Fossil fuel companies should be paying for the damage they cause through taxes and fines, not using our favorite sports to hide their impact.

That’s why Greenpeace is calling for the International Olympic Committee (IOC) to drop oil and gas sponsorship from the Winter Olympic and Paralympic Games – and commit to ending fossil fuel sponsorship across all Olympic Games. 

Winter Olympics 2026 video frame
Oilympics: The Games on Thin Ice

Fossil fuel companies are greenwashing their image by sponsoring big sporting events to hide their destruction. Don’t let them get away with it.

Add your name

This has happened before with tobacco advertising. Once the scientific consensus on the harms of smoking became too strong to ignore, the IOC banned tobacco advertising ahead of the 1988 Winter Olympics in Calgary. It played a key role in denormalising cigarette advertisements and set a strong precedent that was followed by sporting bodies and other event organisers around the world. It serves as a powerful testament to the power of the IOC to help shape policy at a global level and it shows that the same can be done with fossil fuel sponsorship and advertising.

Fossil fuel sponsorship benefits no one but oil and gas corporations; it distracts everyone from the environmental destruction they cause and the communities they harm. Fossil fuel corporations must be phased out as part of a just transition to renewable energy, not using sponsorships to polish their image while driving the climate crisis that threatens the future of winter sport.

Sophie Allain is a campaigner at Greenpeace International and is based in London, UK.

Note: This article was edited on 3 January at 18.45 CET to clarify two figures related to glacier ice loss.

Sources:

PDF
03.02.2026 à 08:00

Greenpeace calls out oil and gas giant Eni’s Winter Olympics sponsorship

Greenpeace International

Texte intégral (611 mots)

Milan, Italy  – Greenpeace Italy has launched a hard-hitting video that highlights the absurdity of Italian oil and gas giant Eni’s sponsorships of the Milano Cortina Games, as one of the corporations stealing our winters through its planet-heating pollution.

One year of Eni’s emissions could melt enough glacier ice to fill 2.5 million Olympic swimming pools, demonstrating the corporation’s central role in the climate crisis that threatens the future viability of the Games and winter sports.[1]

WATCH THE VIDEO HERE

Greenpeace Italy climate campaigner Federico Spadini said:

“Fossil fuel driven climate change is putting the Winter Olympics and Paralympics at risk and the International Olympic Committee (IOC) cannot ignore this. The Olympic values of respect for people and the environment matter, that’s why Greenpeace is calling for the International Olympic Committee to drop oil and gas sponsorship from the Winter Olympic and Paralympic Games and commit to ending fossil fuel sponsorship across all Olympic Games.” 

The satirical Greenpeace Italy video, created by Studio Birthplace, shows speed skaters, skiers and bobsledders racing along, with Eni logos prominent. Suddenly a trickle of oil turns into a tsunami, sweeping the athletes off their feet, causing them to slip and crash as a sea of oil washes over them. 

The video lays bare the real impact of oil and gas on winter sports, including the Olympics, and warns of the risk of losing them forever without a rapid transition from fossil fuels to clean, renewable energy. More than half of the potential host cities Winter Games will be “climate-unreliable” by the 2080s, according to a rigorous 2024 scientific study funded by the IOC.[1] This is why Greenpeace is calling for the IOC to end fossil fuel sponsorship across the Winter Olympic and Paralympic Games and all Olympic Games through an open letter published today.[2]

The IOC has previously used its unique position of global trust and influence to help combat industries that harm people, banning tobacco advertising ahead of the 1988 Winter Olympics in Calgary. Now it can help lead the shift away from fossil fuels by refusing sponsorship from fossil fuel corporations like Eni who are threatening the winters we all love with their emissions.

To raise awareness of the call for the IOC to reject fossil fuel sponsorship of the Olympic Games, Greenpeace Italy will join a national march organised by civil society organisations in Milan on February 7th to protest the environmental, economic, and social impacts of the Games.

ENDS

Notes:

[1] The climate crisis and the future of the Winter Olympics

[2] Copy of the open letter

Eni is currently in a legal battle with Greenpeace Italy. In 2023, Greenpeace Netherlands released a study that applied the Mortality Cost of Carbon method, which projected that Eni’s self reported emissions for 2022 alone could cause 27,000 temperature-related excess deaths by the end of the century. Instead of changing their business, Eni attempted to silence these legitimate criticisms by suing Greenpeace Italy. 

Contacts:

Martin Zavan, Communications Specialist, Greenpeace International, +61 424 295 422, mzavan@greenpeace.org

Greenpeace International Press Desk: +31 (0)20 718 2470 (available 24 hours), pressdesk.int@greenpeace.org

PDF
03.02.2026 à 07:32

Climate Whiplash: Understanding today’s violent weather extremes

Dr Simon Bradshaw

Texte intégral (1932 mots)

This story was originally posted by Greenpeace Australia Pacific.

In mid January 2026, Australians watched in disbelief as an extreme downpour and violent flash flood swept cars on Victoria’s Great Ocean Road into the sea. Just days earlier, the state was in the grip of catastrophic fire conditions and the most dangerous heatwave since the infamous Black Summer of 2019-20. Once again, Victoria is in the grip of an extreme heatwave, this one even more intense than the last.

These wild swings between weather extremes – between hot and dry to heavy rains and back again – have become all too familiar to Australians and to vulnerable communities around the world.

A scene of devastation after a  intense rainfall triggered severe flash flooding. Multiple vehicles and a expansive area are covered in thick mud, large logs, and debris in a valley surrounded by hillsides.
15 January 2026, intense rainfall triggered severe flash flooding along a stretch of the Great Ocean Road, including Lorne, Separation Creek, Cumberland River, Wye River and Kennett River. © Anonymous

So what is driving this new world of violent weather extremes?

Sometimes climate science can seem fiendishly complex. But in essence things are very simple. By burning coal, oil, and gas we have thickened up the blanket of heat trapping gases in our atmosphere, meaning that today our atmosphere is not only hotter, but also wetter and packing more energy.

It means that heatwaves are hotter, longer and more frequent, rainfall is more intense, and fire seasons are longer and more dangerous. Moreover, with more energy to fuel powerful storms, and the ability of our warmer atmosphere to soak up more moisture, the swing from one extreme to another has become more rapid and intense.

Dehydrated Koala in the Aftermath of the Victorian Bushfires in Longwood, Victoria, Australia. © Paul Hilton / Earth Tree Images
Dehydrated koala in the aftermath of the 2026 Victorian bushfires in Longwood, Victoria, Australia.
© Paul Hilton / Earth Tree Images

The past is no longer a guide for the future

The change in the background conditions driving our weather means that past weather patterns are no longer a good guide for the present. We are seeing extreme events unfold in places and at times where they never have before, at least not in living memory, meaning communities are more likely to be caught off guard. Cyclones are tracking further south, large wildfires are happening way outside of the usual season, shifting rainfall patterns are wreaking havoc with food production.

From Melbourne to Mozambique

The term “climate whiplash” emerged during our 2023-24 summer, when an early and ferocious fire season, driven by an El Niño pattern, gave way unexpectedly to record breaking rains. A deadly Queensland blaze in October 2023 destroyed more homes in that state than the infamous Black Summer fires did. Just weeks later, nearby weather stations registered their highest November rainfall on record. Down south, early and highly destructive fires in Gippsland, Victoria were followed almost immediately by extreme rainfall and flash flooding.

Aftermath of the Victorian Bushfires in Longwood, Victoria, Australia. © Paul Hilton / Earth Tree Images
Parts of Victoria, Australia just suffered some of its worst bushfires since the Black Summer fires of 2019–20. Over 400,000 hectares are estimated to have burnt so far, an area more than five times larger than Singapore.
© Paul Hilton / Earth Tree Images

For many, this has come to epitomise the lived experience of climate change. And not just in Australia. On the east coast of the US, 2025 saw many communities face multiple spells of dangerous heat and humidity. Today, many of those same communities are gripped by a deadly winter storm and extreme low temperatures.

On the west coast, in California, years of severe drought were followed by exceptionally wet winters in 2022-23 and 2023-24, leading to explosive growth of vegetation. When this record wet period was followed by California’s hottest summer on record and a record-dry start to 2025, the conditions were set for the horrific LA fires.

Powerful Winds Fuel Multiple Fires Across Los Angeles Area. © David McNew / Greenpeace
Firefighters battle the Eaton Fire on January 8, 2025 in Altadena, California.. Powerful Santa Ana winds pushed the fire across more than 10,000 acres in less than 24 hours.
© David McNew / Greenpeace

On the other side of the world, in Mozambique, a prolonged dry period in 2024 and 2025 saw the country face significant food insecurity due to crop failure. In January 2026, Mozambique is tragically facing a severe humanitarian situation due to extreme downpours and catastrophic flooding. Over a hundred people have died, and close to a million affected.

Adding fuel to the fire

Put simply, climate change, driven by the burning of coal, oil and gas, is catapulting vulnerable communities from one catastrophe to another. Hit by a succession of compounding disasters, with little or no time to recover, many are seeing their resilience pushed beyond its limits. The toll on our mental health has been profound.

The first duty of governments is to keep our communities safe. But right now, many are doing exactly the opposite. In Australia, our State and Federal Governments continue to enable the dangerous expansion of fossil fuel production. In December 2025, the Victorian Government, alongside Federal authorities, opened new areas for gas exploration in the Otway Basin, off the Victorian coast.

Every new fossil fuel project increases the future risks for communities in Australia, the Pacific and around the world.

Aerial image of the Barracouta gas platform in the Gippsland Basin. © Greenpeace / Michaela Skovranova
Aerial documentation of the Barracouta gas platform in the Gippsland Basin, about 23 km off Victoria’s east coast. The Federal and State government in Victoria have recently opened a massive new area for offshore gas exploration, and a number of gas corporations are currently drilling for new gas off the iconic coast.
© Greenpeace / Michaela Skovranova

Time for a fair, fast fossil fuel phase out

2026 will be a defining year for the world’s transition away from fossil fuels.

Pacific Island countries have been working for many years to spearhead a global phase-out of coal oil and gas. In a few short weeks, Vanuatu and Tuvalu will be among dozens of countries gathering in the coal port Santa Martha for the First International Conference on the Just Transition Away from Fossil Fuel, a powerful new initiative led by the Government of Colombia.

Meanwhile, as Australia prepares to take on the role of President of Negotiations for COP31, we have the responsibility to lead. Now more than ever.

The science is unequivocal: we must transition away from fossil fuels at emergency speed, while doing far more to support our communities with adapting to this new era of climate whiplash.

The future is ours to choose. Get involved.

Dr Simon Bradshaw is the Climate Advisor at Greenpeace Australia Pacific.

PDF
02.02.2026 à 01:45

A victory for Bonaire and a turning point for climate justice

Eefje de Kroon, Martin Zavan & Maria Alejandra Serra

Texte intégral (1613 mots)

“Today, we are making history. Finally, The Hague can no longer ignore us. The court is drawing a line in the sand. Our lives, our culture, and our country are being taken seriously. The State can no longer look the other way.” – Onnie Emerenciana, plaintiff in the Bonaire Climate Case

On 28 January, residents of Bonaire won a historic victory, not just for themselves and their island, but for communities everywhere who are rising up for climate justice.

In a landmark ruling, the District Court of The Hague found that the Netherlands is violating Bonaire residents’ human rights by failing to protect them from the climate crisis. 

The judgment makes clear that the Dutch state cannot treat residents of Bonaire, a Caribbean island with 25,000 inhabitants, as second-class citizens and must effectively protect them from the impacts of climate change.

This case was led by eight courageous residents of Bonaire and supported by Greenpeace Netherlands. 

This victory belongs first and foremost to the people of Bonaire, who took their lived experiences of climate impacts from their island home to a courtroom thousands of kilometres away and demanded justice. The stories of these courageous community members motivate movements, their cultural interventions inspire our imagination and protect more than their heritage, their victory becomes a stepping stone for others. 

Historic Victory: Court Rules State’s Climate Policy Insufficient in Bonaire Climate Case. © Marten van Dijl / Greenpeace / Greenpeace
© Marten van Dijl / Greenpeace

A breakthrough years in the making

Bonaire is already on the frontline of the climate crisis. Extreme heat, disappearing corals and rising sea levels are affecting daily life on the island. Yet while the Dutch government has been proactive about protecting people living in the Netherlands in Europe, it has failed to offer the same level of protection to the people of Bonaire.

That stark inequality is at the heart of this case.

In January 2024, Bonaire residents and Greenpeace went to court to challenge this injustice. They argued that the state’s climate policies fell short of its human rights obligations, and that people living on Bonaire were paying the price.

The court agreed.

In its ruling, the judges recognised what residents of Bonaire have long known: Climate change already poses a real and growing threat to their lives and livelihoods. The Court clearly said that “the State has a legal obligation to protect the right of Bonaire’s inhabitants to life, health, well-being and the enjoyment of their own culture against the negative effects of climate change”. 

Historic Victory: Court Rules State’s Climate Policy Insufficient in Bonaire Climate Case. © Marten van Dijl / Greenpeace / Greenpeace
© Marten van Dijl / Greenpeace

Part of a growing global momentum

Around the world, communities are turning to the courts to demand climate justice, and they are winning.

From senior women to concerned youth challenging weak climate laws, to Indigenous communities defending their lands, culture and traditions, to island nations seeking accountability for climate damage, the message is growing louder: governments and corporations cannot ignore the climate crisis without legal consequences.

The Bonaire ruling builds on this momentum. It shows that courts are increasingly willing to listen to climate-vulnerable communities, to take science seriously, and to recognise that climate inaction is a violation of fundamental human rights.

Each case builds on the last, and strengthens the next. Each victory sends a signal that climate action is a human regard for people and the planet, and is a legal and moral obligation.

Ruling in the Bonaire Climate Case. © Marten van Dijl / Greenpeace / Greenpeace
© Marten van Dijl / Greenpeace

People power at the heart of change

What makes this win especially powerful is the leadership shown by Bonaireans themselves,they spoke up about their homes, their health, and their children’s futures.

Greenpeace Netherlands supported people from Bonaire by commissioning research that showed how climate risks in Bonaire will intensify under current policies, by amplifying residents’ voices, and by standing with them every step of the way. The legal teams from Kennedy van der Laan and Prakken d’Oliveira, Greenpeace International and strategic allies provided vital expertise, helping turn lived experience into legal force.

This is what can happen when people power harnesses the law. Across the world, those who are most impacted are rising and synchronising their struggles: from the streets to schoolyards, from courtrooms to cafés, from extraction sites to exhibitions, from homes to halls of power. Their resistance crosses borders, disciplines and generations. 

What happens next?

This ruling is a milestone, but it is not the end of the story.

The Dutch state must immediately comply fully with its obligations. That means stronger climate action, faster emissions cuts, and an adaptation plan that protects people in Bonaire from the worsening impacts of the climate crisis.

For supporters around the world, it shows that change is possible. It shows that when communities organise, when their stories and science are brought into the courtroom, and when people refuse to accept injustice, even powerful governments can be held to account and forced to change.

Historic Victory: Court Rules State’s Climate Policy Insufficient in Bonaire Climate Case. © Marten van Dijl / Greenpeace / Greenpeace
© Marten van Dijl / Greenpeace

A victory for all

Today, we celebrate the people of Bonaire, their courage, their tenacity and their belief that justice is worth fighting for.

And we take this victory as a resounding endorsement of the path we are on. We’ll keep pushing, keep rising with climate-vulnerable communities, and keep demanding a world where climate action is fast, fair and grounded in human rights.

When people fight for their future, it changes what’s possible for everyone.

Eefje de Kroon is a campaigner at Greenpeace Netherlands, based in Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Martin Zavan is a freelance communications strategist at Greenpeace International, based in Sydney, Australia

Maria Alejandra Serra is Legal Counsel Climate Specialist at Greenpeace International, based in Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

PDF
30.01.2026 à 12:22

Greenpeace Pictures of the Week

Greenpeace International

Texte intégral (1840 mots)

A huge victory for climate justice for Bonaire, the Rainbow Warrior in Cape Town, and a call to end the tyranny of fossil fuels in Belgium. Here are a few of our favourite images from Greenpeace work around the world this week. Comment below which you like best!


Historic Victory: Court Rules State’s Climate Policy Insufficient in Bonaire Climate Case. © Marten van Dijl / Greenpeace / Greenpeace
© Marten van Dijl / Greenpeace

🇳🇱 The Netherlands – This week, in a major victory for climate justice, the District Court of The Hague ruled that the Dutch State’s climate policy violates the human rights of residents of Bonaire and treats them unequally compared to people in European Netherlands. With its current climate targets and measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, the State is failing to comply with international agreements. As a result, the State is acting unlawfully toward the residents of Bonaire.

The court also found that The Netherlands has not taken sufficient measures to protect the residents of Bonaire in the climate crisis. The court orders the Dutch State to draw up an adaptation plan and implement it no later than 2030. In addition, within 18 months, they must set new binding targets for the entire Dutch economy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and to make a fair contribution to the goal of limiting global warming to a maximum of 1.5 degrees.


Mobilisation for Europe’s Energy Independence in Brussels. © Eric De Mildt / Greenpeace
© Eric De Mildt / Greenpeace

🇧🇪 Belgium – Greenpeace Belgium activists inflated 10-metre-long representations of Putin and Trump sitting on a gas tanker in front of the EU Council headquarters in Brussels, to symbolise Europe’s dependence on fossil fuel imports from autocrats. They are warning EU leaders not to replace Putin’s gas with Trump’s gas, but instead to protect Europe’s political independence and achieve true energy security by phasing out fossil gas and accelerating the shift to a fully renewable energy system.


Projection on Gösgen Nuclear Power Plant in Switzerland. © Miriam Künzli / Greenpeace
© Miriam Künzli / Greenpeace

🇨🇭 Switzerland – On Wednesday evening, Greenpeace Switzerland activists projected a film and a series of messages onto the cooling tower of the decommissioned Gösgen nuclear power plant. The aim is to denounce the decades-long cover-up of the safety breach in the plant’s feedwater system and the associated danger to the population.


Rainbow Warrior Open Boat Days – V&A Waterfront, Cape Town, South Africa. © Greenpeace / Dan Hargrove
© Greenpeace / Dan Hargrove

🇿🇦 South Africa – Greenpeace Africa hosted Open Boat Days aboard the iconic Rainbow Warrior while docked in Cape Town, welcoming over 1,200 members of the public onboard. Visitors toured the ship, met crew members and Greenpeace teams, learned about non-violent direct action, and engaged in conversations about climate justice, ocean protection, and people-powered change.


Pop-up Action Theater at CPC Headquarters in Taiwan. © Chong Kok Yew / Greenpeace
© Chong Kok Yew / Greenpeace

🇹🇼 Taiwan – Greenpeace Taiwan staged a protest outside CPC Corp, Taiwan headquarters, warning that CPC is pushing the “New Fourth Naphtha Cracker” expansion despite five consecutive years of deficits. Greenpeace estimates the project could generate additional losses of over NT$11 billion annually from 2030, based on market pricing amid petrochemical oversupply. Greenpeace urged CPC to halt the project, reassess its petrochemical strategy, and develop a credible transition roadmap.


Solidarity against SLAPP Energy Transfer Lawsuit at the Sydney Opera House. © Greenpeace / Alison Lee Rubie
© Greenpeace / Alison Lee Rubie

🇦🇺 Australia – Activists stage a peaceful protest in front of the Sydney Opera House, Australia in solidarity with Greenpeace International and Greenpeace in the USA, facing a meritless SLAPP lawsuit from fossil fuel company Energy Transfer. Greenpeace USA was one of many organisations showing solidarity with peaceful Standing Rock activists and the Indigenous-led prayer camps against Energy Transfer and the Dakota Access Pipeline.


Rainbow Warrior Open Boat Days – V&A Waterfront, Cape Town, South Africa. © Greenpeace / Dan Hargrove
© Greenpeace / Dan Hargrove

🇿🇦 South Africa – Members of the public and crew of the Rainbow Warrior aboard the iconic Rainbow Warrior while docked in Cape Town, hold signs calling for an end to the age of plastic.


Greenpeace has been a pioneer of photo activism for more than 50 years, and remains committed to bearing witness and exposing environmental injustice through the images we capture.

To see more Greenpeace photos and videos, visit our Media Library.

PDF
10 / 10

  Bon Pote
Actu-Environnement
Amis de la Terre
Aspas
Biodiversité-sous-nos-pieds

 Bloom
Canopée
Décroissance (la)
Deep Green Resistance
Déroute des routes
Faîte et Racines
 Fracas
F.N.E (AURA)
Greenpeace Fr
JNE
La Relève et la Peste
La Terre
Le Lierre
Le Sauvage
Low-Tech Mag.
Motus & Langue pendue
Mountain Wilderness
Negawatt
 Observatoire de l'Anthropocène

 Reporterre
Présages
Reclaim Finance
Réseau Action Climat
Résilience Montagne
SOS Forêt France
Stop Croisières

  Terrestres

  350.org
Vert.eco
Vous n'êtes pas seuls